Filsafat Ilmu Design Based Learning (DBL) pada Pendidikan Vokasi: Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi

Sussi Widiastuti; Siti Masitoh; Mochamad Nursalim

Authors

Sussi Widiastuti ⁽¹⁾ Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Siti Masitoh ⁽²⁾ Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Mochamad Nursalim ⁽³⁾ Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Keywords:

filsafat ilmu, design-based learning (DBL), pendidikan vokasi, ontologi, epistemologi, aksiologi

Abstract

The world has entered the era of knowledge-based society and economy which is open (digital) and relies on free competition. The new era brought changes in the skills required by the job market. Vocational education and training at the secondary education needs to equip graduates with life and career skills: productivity and accountability in managing projects and producing products. Based on data from Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) 2021, the ratio of the number of entrepreneurs in Indonesia is still 3.47 percent or only around 9 million people of the total population. The percentage of trading business owners who are graduates of Vocational High Schools (SMK) is 5.5%. Through the SMK revitalization program in 2020 it is hoped that conditions will be created in 80% of SMK graduates work in their fields, 12% are entrepreneurs, and 8% continue their studies. SMK gradute can be identified by the competency of each expertise program, so that the existence of products or applied results for society is absolutely there. A learning concept that can facilitate SMK students in producing products is a design-based learning/DBL. DBL as a science is an activity of knowledge and explanation that has direction and purpose. This activity is carried out with certain procedures, using methods, steps and means of support. Philosophy of science invites people to reflect on their knowledge activities through three foundations of discussion, namely: ontology, epistemology, and axiology. This literature study aims to examine the DBL framework from three aspects above.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apedoe, X.A., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M.R., & Schunn, C.D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465.

Baley, R. (2006). Assessing engineering design process knowledge. International Journal Engineering Education, 22(3), 508–518.

Barnes, M. (2013). Role reversal: achieving uncommonly excellent results in the studentcentered classroom. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Behrens, A., Atorf, L., Schwann, R., Neumann, B., Schnitzler, R., & Balle, J. (2010). MATLAB meets LEGO Mindstorms—A freshman introduction course into practical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 306–317.

Chang, G.-W., Yeh, Z.-M., Pan, S.-Y., Liao, C.-C., & Chang, H.-M. (2008). A progressive design approach to enhance project-based learning in applied electronics through an optoelectornic sensing project. IEEE Transaction on Education, 51(2), 220–233.

Cheville, R. A., McGovern, A., & Bull, K. S. (2005). The light applications in science and engineering research collaborative undergraduate laboratory for teaching (LASE CULT)—Relevant experiential learning in photonics. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(2), 254–263.

Chinowsky, P. S., Brown, H., Szjnman, A., & Realph, A. (2006). Developing knowledge landscapes through project-based learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 132(2), 118–124.

Clyde, S. W., & Crane, A. E. (2003). Design-n-code fests. Computer Science Education, 13(4), 289–303.

Davis, M., Hawley, P., McMullan, B., & Spilka, G. (1997). Design as a catalyst for learning. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003). Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657–662.

Denayer, I., Thaels, K., Vander Sloten, J., & Gobin, R. (2003). Teaching a structured approach to the design process for undergraduate engineering student by problem-based education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 203–214.

Dewey, J., & Small, A. W. (2010). My pedagogic creed. Ann Arbor, MI: Scholarly Publishing Office, Univ. of Michigan Univ. Library.

Doppelt, Y. (2009). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(1), 55-65.

Doppelt, Y., Mehalik, M.M., Schunn, C.D., Silk, E., & Krysinski, D. (2008). Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context. Journal of Technology Education, 19(2), 22-39.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY, US: Random House

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., & Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.

Ernita. (2019). Filsafat Ilmu. Medan: Wal Ashri Publishing.

Etkina, E., Karelina, A., Ruibal-Villasenor, M., Rosengrant, D., Jordan, R., & Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2010). Design and reflection help students develop scientific abilities: Learning in introductory physics laboratories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 54–98.

Etkina, E., Murthy, S., & Zou, X. (2006). Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design. American Journal of Physics, 74(11), 979–986.

Fortus, D., Dershimer, R.C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Designbased science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10),1081–1110.

Geber, E., McKenna A., Hirsch, P., & Yarnoff, C. (2010). Learning to waste and wasting to learn? How to use cradle to cradle principles to improve the teaching of design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 314–323.

Hirsch, P. L., Shwom, B. L., Yarnoff, C., Anderson, J C., Kelso, D.M., & Olson, G.B. (2001). Engineering design and communication: The case for interdisciplinary collaboration. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 and 5), 342–348.

Hoskinson, A., Barger, N., & Martin, A. (2014). Keys to a Successful Student? Centered Classroom: Three Recommendations. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America,95(3), 281-292.

Jacobson, M. L., Said, R. A., & Rehman, H. (2006). Introducing design skills at the freshman level: Structured design experience. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(2), 247–253.

Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79.

Kalkani, E. C., Boussiakou, I. K., & Boussiakou, L. G. (2005). The paper beam: Hands-on design for team work experience of freshman in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(3), 393–402.

Kemendikbud. (2016). Revitalisasi SMK.

Kimmel, S. J., & Deek, F. P. (2005). Using a problem-solving heuristic to teach engineering graphics. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 32(2), 135–146.

Kimmel, S. J., Kimmel, H. S., & Deek, F. P. (2003). The common skills of problem solving: From program development to engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(6), 810–817.

Kolodner, J. & Nagel, K. (1999). A collaborative learning tool in support of learning from problem-solving and design activities. Proceeding CSCL '99. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.

Kolodner, J. (2002). Learning by design™: of science skills: Cognitive Studies, 9(3), 338-350.

Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P.J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S.,& Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495-547.

Kundu, S., & Fowler, M.W. (2009). Use of engineering design competitions for undergraduate and capstone projects. Chemical Engineering Education, 43(2), 131–136.

Lee, C.-S., Su, J.-H., Lin, K.-E., Chang, J.-H., & Lin, G.-H. (2010). A project-based laboratory for learning embedded system design with Industry support. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 173–181.

Linge, N., & Parsons, D. (2006). Problem-based learning as an effective tool for teaching computer network design. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(1), 5–10.

Lyon, J. S., & Brader, J. S. (2004). Using the learning cycle to develop freshmen’s abbilities to design and conduct experiments. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 32(2), 126–134.

Maase, E. L. (2008). Activity problem solving and applied research methods in a graduate course on numerical methods. Chemical Engineering Education, 42(1), 23–32.

Macías-Guarasa, J., Montero, J.M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., & Nieto-Taladriz O. (2006). A project based learning approach to design electronic systems Curricula. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 389–397.

Martínez Monés, A., Gómez Sánchez, E., Dim d , Y.A., Jo ?ín Abellán, I.M., & Rubia Avi, B. (2005). Multiple case studies to enhance project-based learning in a computer architecture course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(3), 482–488.

Massey, A. P., Ramesh, V., & Khatri, V. (2006). Design, development and assessment of mobile applications: The case for problem-based learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(2), 183–192.

McKenna, A., Colgate, J. E., Carr, S. H., & Olson, G. B. (2006). IDEA: Formalizing the foundation for an engineering design education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 671–678.

McKinsey and Company. (2019). Otomasi dan masa depan pekerjaan di Indonesia: Pekerjaan yang hilang, muncul dan berubah.

McMartin, F., McKenna, A., & Youssefi, K. (2000). Scenario assignments as assessment tools for undergraduate engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 111–119.

Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C.D. (2008). Middle-school science through design based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 1–15.

Mehalik, M. M., & Schunn, C. (2006). What constitutes good design? A review of empirical studies of design processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 519–532.

Mese, E. (2006). Project-oriented adjustable speed motor drive course for undergraduate curricula. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(2), 236–246.

Miller, R. L., & Olds, B.M. (1994). A model curriculum for a capstone course in multidisciplinary engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(4), 1–6.

Minter, M. K. (2011). Learner-Centered (LCI) vs. Teacher-Centered (TCI) Instruction: A Classroom Management Perspective.American Journal of Business Education,4(5), 55-62.

Mistikoglu, S., & Özyalc¸ I. (2010). Design and development of a cartesian robot for multidisciplinary engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 30–39.

Nazir, Moh. (2013). Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Nelson, D. (2006). The 6 ½ steps of Backwards Thinking™. Retrieved from http://www.cpp.edu/~dnelson/methodology/6.5steps.html

Nhem, L. (2015). Descriptive case study: Teachers’ application of DBL principles toward creating a common core-aligned curriculum. (Doctoral dissertation).

Nonclercq, A., Vander Biest, A., De Cuyper, K., Leroy, E., López, M.D., & Robert, F. (2010). Problem based learning in instrumentation: Synergism of real and virtual modular acquisition chains. IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 234–242.

Nooshabadi, S., & Garside, J. (2006). Modernization of teaching in embedded systems design—An international collaborative project. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(2),254–262.

Pavlova, M. (2009). Technology and Vocational education for sustainabledevelopment: Empowering Individuals for the Future. Queensland: Springer.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

Puente, Gomez, S. M. (2014). Design-based learning: exploring an educational approach for engineering education. Technise Universiteit Eindhoven.

Rasyidin, A., & Mardianto. (2017). Filsafat Ilmu. Medan: Fakultas Tarbiyah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara.

Ringwood, J. V., Monaghan, K., & Malaco, J. (2005). Teaching engineering design through Lego Mindstorms. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91–104.

Roberts, L. (2001). Developing experimental design and troubleshooting skills in an advanced biochemistry lab. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29, 10–15.

Rosa, R. (2014). Design-Based Learning: A Methofology for Teaching and Assessing Creativity. A Dissertation. Pomona: Faculty of California State Polytechnic University.

Selfridge, R. H., Schultz, S. M., & Hawkins, A. R. (2007). Free space optical link as a model undergraduate design project. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50(3).

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

Shyr, W.-J. (2010). Teaching mechatronics: An innovative group project-based approach. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. doi:10.1002/cae.20377.

Stiver, W. (2010). Sustainable design in a second year engineering design course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 378–383. Tien, L.T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J.A. (2002). Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 606–632.

Sudira, Putu MP. (2011). Pendidikan Vokasi dan Pengembangan Bakat. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sumarto. (2017). Filsafat Ilmu. Cetakan pertama. Jambi: Pustaka Ma’arif Press.

Van Til, R. P., Tracey, M.W., Sengupta, S., & Fliedner, G. (2009). Teaching lean with an interdisciplinary problem solving learning approach. International Journal Engineering Education, 25(1), 173–180.

Widarto. (2009). Model Pendidikan Vokasi yang Efektif dan Efisien.

Wood, J., Campbell, M., Wood, K., & Jensen, D. (2005). Enhancing the teaching of machine design by creating a basic hands-on. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 33(1), 1–25.

Zhan, W., & Porter, J.R. (2010). Using project-based learning to teach six sigma principles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 655–666.